My Oral Presentation Reflection

 The Dandelion Student Impact Team

                                                              Guess who's who!

Dear diary,
I guess I better write my reflections down first, before they all fly out of my head.

On Monday (1 Nov 2010), The Dandelion Student Impact Team gave an oral presentation. Before I start on how I thought I performed, I must say that I thoroughly enjoyed working with my group members - Daniel, Yong Xin, You Sheng. They are a fun-loving, great bunch of people. Even though we've our differences, misunderstandings, other commitments and IPI, we enjoyed each other's company (well, most of the time we do). I have learnt a lot from each of them - learnt what it means to really listen, saw that a difference in opinions can be solved by negotiation and not merely brushed aside. The topic of our presentations is to convince the audience, who are supposedly representatives of the NUS Excellence Unit, to adopt our proposed solutions to improve RAG and Flag. RAG and Flag is a huge topic, with many intricacies and interconnected issue. Yet our team has strived to present as complete a picture to our audience, and that may have been too much for them.

Overall, in terms of work and effort, I'd dare say The Dandelion did an extensive amount of research. We surveyed the NUS population, as well as arranged meetings with Christopher Cheong, Zhen Yu, and gathered opinions and feedback from previous RAG directors. The experience of talking to the RAG organizers definitely shed light on the issue of RAG. The need for change was not just felt among the student population, but also the organizers.

In terms of my own preparation for the presentation, it wasn't enough. It would have been better if the details of the presentation were finalized earlier i.e. focus, direction etc, and that I had spent more time rehearsing the script instead of trying to fine-tune it to perfection. I felt on my part that I had focused too much on preparing the content of the speech for my part, that I did not see the bigger picture of my role as the first speaker. Also, unfortunately, I did not manage to internalize my speech, and the effect was reflected during the actual presentation itself. A lack of sleep was a definite no-no on hindsight. I was ironing my speech until very early of the presentation date, and did not have sufficient sleep. I thought I could still handle that, but my mind couldn't. What was good about the preparation was that, ideas were discussed and incorporated, such as the usage of videos in the introduction part.

In terms of delivery, more rehearsals would have chased the nervousness away. The points were in my head before the actual presentation, yet during the real deal, the points began to melt into each other like snow. What was once clear become blurred and I panicked. It probably showed. I felt I started well. And I noticed Brad looked down at his computer immediately after saying we could began. I figured that he wanted us to do something to catch his attention and make him look up. From my side, I thought my voice was loud enough already, but it apparently wasn't. 'Use the diaphragm' someone suggested. I will keep that in mind the next time I present. That will take some practise, and getting used to my voice being loud. (Maybe I should start practising with friends...:D ) In my bid to sound ' professional' and remember my content, I forgot to engage my audience! And did not manage to show my passion for this subject. "Be more aggressive", someone suggested. Note taken! Then again, I think being aggressive is not always key to an effective presentation, but maybe it is essential in a business proposal presentation. I guess what my friend suggested was to show more passion.

In this aspect, if I were more confident with my script, which would come with more rehearsals, I would have been able to allow my emotions flow through much more naturally. Memorizing from a script will be the first step to killing the connection with audience. Even though I did not physically hold a paper in my hand, I probably held it in my mind. Just as bad, if not worse. Because if I had held my script in my hand, I may have been more assured and less jittery. That being said, it will still not be wise to hold a paper in my hand, because it would have looked less professional. As much as I'd like to think that I am passed the stage of relying on a script, I have to confess that I am not totally out of it, but definitely progressing out of it!

A good take-away was that I was clear and deliberate in my speech and diction, and am glad Miao could understand what I was saying.

In terms of using visual aid, there were good comments about us showing the video for the introduction. It was a pity the projector screen did not do the video nor our slides justice. The quality of the video was good, and the slides looked sleek from the Macbook. In future, it would be good to go and check out the presentation venue, be familiarized with the equipment and to know whether it has the required resolution and components needed.

I must thank the audience for all their good-intentioned comments and constructive feedback about my presentation and my group's. It was a great learning experience. At the end of the day, I hope the audience would be moved and motivated, if not by our presentation then by my shout-out, to support the idea to make changes to RAG. And I sincerely hope that SOMETHING will be done to improve the current NUS RAG day. Because well, it is not as well as it should be. :]

Signing off ~